Dozens of people were injured, 11 of them seriously, after a Hawaiian Airlines flight ran into severe turbulence on a flight yesterday. The injured included an 14 month old infant and a teenager.
There was no warning of the turbulence and some unbuckled passengers hit the ceiling during the incident.
5 passengers were also hospitalized after being injured due to severe turbulence on a United flight from Rio to Houston that landed this morning.
View this post on Instagram
Clear-air turbulence is not uncommon and can occur at any time during a flight. I have flown on flights with severe enough turbulence that it caused injuries onboard.
What should you do about it?
- When you’re in your seat, you should always wear a seatbelt, even if the seatbelt sign isn’t illuminated. Better safe than sorry certainly applies here.
- If you’re flying with an infant, you should purchase a seat for them and have them buckled into a carseat.
It’s true that the FAA doesn’t require a seat for children under 2. Their analysis showed that requiring tickets for children under 2 would mean more people would drive, which is a statistically more dangerous way to travel.
I guess according to that logic, carseats wouldn’t be required in a car if walking was more dangerous than driving.
Aside from the safety aspect, kids in a carseat are much more likely to sleep on a plane and you won’t have to hold them or stop them from opening the airline seatbelt. Plus if you need a carseat at your destination you don’t have to worry about airline baggage handlers mishandling and damaging your carseat.
United flight 232 lead flight attendant Jan Brown survived that harrowing crash in Sioux City went on to become a tireless child safety advocate. At the time, guidance was for lap children to be placed on the ground in case of a crash landing.
Jan told Sylvia Tsao to do just that with her 22 month old boy on the flight. Sylvia survived, but her son Evan did not. Sylvia confronted Jan after the crash and told her, “You told me to put my son on the floor, I did, and he’s gone.”
The book, Flight 232: A Story of Disaster and Survival tells the dramatic story.
Jan has spent years lobbying the NTSB and FAA to require carseats for all children on airplanes. At one point in time, the NTSB considered it one of their top priorities. However the FAA estimated that 20% of families would drive instead of fly if they required that infants be ticketed, so they refused to adopt the rule.
However the FAA does state that, “Your arms aren’t capable of holding your in-lap child securely, especially during unexpected turbulence, which is the number one cause of pediatric injuries on an airplane.
The FAA strongly urges you to secure your child in an approved CRS or other approved device for the entirety of your flight. Buying a ticket for your child is the only way to guarantee that you will be able to use a CRS. It’s the smart and right thing to do so that everyone in your family arrives safely at your destination.”
A bassinet won’t help with turbulence either.
Jan and I corresponded regularly and have become friends since I flew with my family to Israel in 2018 in United Polaris business class. She cares deeply about child safety on planes. I wrote an article previously about my research and experience with carseats in United Polaris business class.
Most airlines allow carseats in economy, but many ban them in business class as the FAA hasn’t tested the use of carseats in angled seats.
It’s absurd that after years of angled business class seats that the FAA still hasn’t tested how carseats perform in angled seats.
Let’s just say that Jan is no fan of the FAA, which she calls a worthless agency, and she’s livid at United’s carseat restrictions. She rattles off many other flights where parents who were not able to hold onto their lap children and wound up paying the ultimate price due to the FAA’s failure to requite seats for everyone. She is very frustrated to hear that flight attendants would advise anyone to hold their infant instead of using a carseat.
Half of United’s Polaris business seats face straight forward, but United still banned carseats in all Polaris seats. This is against FAA rules that require airlines to allow carseats to be used in all seats that can accommodate them.
However, I have found that just mentioning Jan’s name to a United flight attendant works wonders for us. Jan says that she never lived down the fact that she followed the manual in advising parents to put their lap children on the floor. United flight attendants today revere Jan and stop to think if it really makes sense to not allow infants in a car seat in a forward facing seat, just because the manual says not to:
The next time you’re buying a flight with an infant, I hope you’ll consider buying your child a seat and bringing a carseat on the plane. It’s a small price to pay for knowing that your child will be safe.
You can use tools like turbli that attempt to predict how much turbulence will be on your flight, but in the end there’s just no way to know what will happen when you’re cruising at 550MPH some 7 miles up in the sky.
It can be a bumpy ride in the sky, buckle up folks!
Leave a Reply
45 Comments On "Passengers Hospitalized On 2 Flights This Week After Severe Turbulence: Buckle Your Seatbelt And Buy Your Infant A Seat!"
All opinions expressed below are user generated and the opinions aren’t provided, reviewed or endorsed by any advertiser or DansDeals.
Hi Dan, thank you for this article. What do you think of a 2.5 year old flying just with her own seat and using the plane’s seat belt?
Personally we still use a carseat at that age, but as long as the kid will stay seated in the buckle, it should be fine.
That’s if the strap is even tight enough.
Dan, do you have a car seat that you recommend? Been using the Doona until now but now my kid grew out of it. Looking for something lightweight. Thanks for looking out for us!
After an infant seat we use this for travel use until 40 lbs/40″:
https://fave.co/3WcfZMb
And this for travel use after 40 lbs/40″:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07Y5VHBBR/?tag=cl03f-20&smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&th=1
Dan, by just reading this article I feel I became smarter. All journalism should be so informative. Thank you for bringing it up
Thanks 🙂
The story with flight 232 recent?
https://www.dansdeals.com/more/news/airline-news/goodbye-al-haynes-hero-captain-united-flight-232-disaster-thoughts-jan-brown-child-safety-planes/
Dan,
When you fly Polaris, have you succeeded in getting a carseat onboard each time? If not, do you downgrade to Y To put the kids in carseats?
Yes, we have, thanks to invoking the Jan Brown rule.
YMMV.
“Their analysis showed that requiring tickets for children under 2 would mean more people would drive, which is a statistically more dangerous way to travel.
I guess according to that logic, carseats wouldn’t be required in a car if walking was more dangerous than driving.”
There is a difference between the 2.
If a family needs to pay extra for a seat for their infant, the family is more likely to drive (because when it’s too expensive to fly people tend to drive!). That will result in a higher net amount of infant casualties because driving is MANY times more dangerous than flying.
Walking however, is usually not an alternative to driving. So even if walking WAS more dangerous than driving no-one would walk to avoid the expense of putting in a carseat. Because you simply can’t walk from Cleveland to Lakewood.
At the end of the day this is the safest and most logical policy when you look at the bigger picture (total infant deaths when traveling). If someone can afford to pay for an extra seat on a plane no-one is stopping them.
P.S.
(HT?)
Ok, so according to your logic, why not require a car seat on flights longer than 500 miles? Or 1,000 miles? Or overseas flights?
Now you’re getting technical. Imagine how confusing it would be!
The logic is simple: The overwhelmingly safest way for infants to travel is in a plane, a few tragedies notwithstanding.
Once you add in different rules about distance people will drive and more kids will die.
And yes, a couple + 1 kid is a 50% more expensive ticket. A family with 2, 3, 4+ kids is exorbitant.
Most people don’t have unlimited miles and the more the FAA can do to incentivize people to fly over drive, the better off we are.
Everything about air travel is confusing, but people learn.
Nobody is driving from NYC to MIA or LAX because they had to buy their 1 year old a seat.
If that were true, why not require car seats on flights where driving is impossible? Just like you can’t walk from Cleveland To Lakewood- you can’t drive from Cleveland to Tel Aviv 🙂
“I guess according to that logic, carseats wouldn’t be required in a car if walking was more dangerous than driving.“
Huh?
Do more people walk than drive due to a car seat requirement?
My point exactly.
I just see these stories and think how terrified I would have been on there I fly often and as much as I know its irrational, when a plane hits turbulence I get so nervous. Like the pilot will lose control or something
“When you’re in your seat, you should always wear a seatbelt, even if the seatbelt sign isn’t illuminated”
Do you do this?
I do. It’s not a hard thing to do.
Always. It’s not exactly an uncomfortable 5 point harness.
Sure.
When my kids were that age it always baffled me that airlines demanded we take them out of the carriers strapped to our chest (where they were often asleep) and told us we had to hold them outside the carrier during take off and landing. I tried to argue a few times that in case or turbulence the baby would be much safer strapped to us than in our arms. Never succeeded but usually could just pretend to comply and then put the baby back when they turned away. Silliness.
Dan i have a 2.5 year old and have used the cosco carseat, problem is he can kick the seat in front, what do you do about that? i stopped taking the carseat on bc of that but he just climbs around. Any tips?
If you are with a family, just put your own family member in the seat in front of the carseat.
Or splurge for the extra legroom seats.
Ur own fam member…And get every traveling media’s attention for “kid runs wild on flight” 8 second video clip
Install the carseat rear-facing. Then he can only kick his own seat. Costco carseat is safe rear facing until 40 inches and 40 lbs and rear facing is always safer anyway (especially in the car).
Easy to say buy another seat when you sit on millions of points
Open up credit cards and you can do that too.
At any rate, I’m just advocating for it. You can do whatever makes you comfortable.
Point being said is that it cost money for most of us. You advocating for it is because it doesn’t cost you anyways so why not take a safety measure. Noone vouches for the more unsafe route but cost can get in the way.
+1
It’s not so simple.
And “open up credit cards” only works if you are American. Non-Americans don’t have access to all these cards you post about with all the benefits.
Of course I have a few 100k points from cc, but 1 trip burns it all so most people think twice before buying any extra seats
not everyone has GS that they can book unlimited seats and hold and cancel at will. your 20+ years of accumulating points/miles is misleading on this point. not disagreeing with the concept of kids being in the seat and if the real reason the FAA is not promoting car seats is bec more people will drive than fly, then we have other real serious issues bec that only makes sense for shorter haul trips.
“Most airlines allow carseats in economy, but many ban them in business class as the FAA hasn’t tested the use of carseats in angled seats.
It’s absurd that after years of angled business class seats that the FAA still hasn’t tested how carseats perform in angled seats.”
I think that what is really going on here is that airlines dont want babies (or kids for that matter) in Business Class. If passengers are paying 3xcoach, they dont want to be anoyed by noisy children. Since this is the most lucrative part of the plane, it is in their interest to keep the expereince as pleasent as possible for the VAST MAJORITY of the business class passengers.
+1
I fully agree but to be fair this hasn’t stopped people from bringing kids in J on the lap. I once had a lap child screaming for the entire night on my flight from Abu Dhabi
Just flew Air France from LAX to TLV with a stopover in Paris. In LA, I had my baby (in a paid for seat) buckled up in a rear facing car seat, and the flight attendant came over and said that we have to get rid of the car seat because the person ahead of it was not able to recline. The only way they let us keep the car seat on the plane was when we agreed to turn the car seat forward and buckle him in the wrong way. We felt forced to do that because all the flight attendants came over and it felt like they were getting ready to kick us off of the flight.
imagine if would be you seating in the front???
Show this to crew: https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_120-87C.pdf
“No aircraft operator may prohibit a child from using an approved CRS when the parent/guardian purchases a seat for the child. If an approved CRS, for which a ticket has been purchased, does not fit in a particular seat on the aircraft, the aircraft operator has the responsibility to accommodate the CRS in another seat in the same class of service.”
I understand that the reason to install the seat rear facing is to prevent neck injury from stopping short etc. Is there any reason to assume that the same issue applies on an airplane? If not, is there any reason not to install it forward facing?
Dan I feel you have a blind spot when it comes to this subject. Just because it’s statistically a tiny bit safer to put an infant in a car seat doesn’t mean it’s a rational policy to require it. Meaning it doesn’t make sense to require many millions of seats to be purchased to save one infant from harm (often meaning just a bruise and even more rarely their life c”v). There are plenty of ways to spend a billion dollars and prevent some tiny harm but it’s not sensible policy, nor is it necessarily a sensible personal decision (to spend hundreds of dollars extra every time you fly to mitigate a statistically negligible odd that something will go wrong).
Listen Mr. More Gelt, that is your decision if you want to pinch pennies or not. Mr. Dan is advocating that we listen to Mr. More Nefesh.
I flew two weeks ago with a 5 month old baby on Air Canada, and the flight attended wanted that we should hold the baby in the lap rather then in a Doona, since the Doona does not have both certificates to be approved for an aircraft. After making a fuss about it they agreed that we can use the Doona but it will be on our “own responsibility”…
We bought the Cosco scenera based on your and others recommendation. Used for 2 round trip flights, each under 2 hours. Soooo recommended, so worth it…. she slept most of the trips, and even when not, she wasn’t jumping and squirming like on previous flights. I was looking up various options for transporting it through the airport, but in the end the simplest solution was to just flip it over between the handle and seat of the stroller. With this, we also had a car seat at our destination.
Re rear-facing: it was mentioned that the point of rear facing is more for a car danger. On an airplane, is it recommended to do rear facing anyway?