United Refuses To Honor 4 Mile (Hong Kong) Island Awards; At Least 1 DansDeals Forum Member Already Has Flown!

Sorry folks, no party in Hong Kong will be happening like there was in Las Vegas and in the Bahamas in the past when hundreds of DansDeals members nabbed price mistakes for all expenses paid vacations.

“Hi Everyone, over the weekend, we discovered a united.com programming error that allowed customers to obtain Mileage Plus travel awards to and from Hong Kong for as little as four miles roundtrip per person, substantially below published levels, which we disclose to customers. We have since corrected the error and will be in contact with customers who have tickets issued at the incorrect award amounts. Customers will be given the choice to redeem at the correct mileage amount or re-deposit their award with all fees waived. We regret any inconvenience this has caused you, and appreciate your understanding.

Shannon Kelly
Director, Customer Insights
United Airlines”

In other words: Do not pass GO. Do not collect $200.

Feeling bummed?

I’m not going to advise anyone what to do if anything at all, but if you do feel like taking some action I will be happy to inform you of your options. It’s definitely within your rights to file a complaint to the US DOT.  These complaints are big black marks for the airlines and are your way of fighting back should you so desire.  The DOT enforces penalties of up to $27,000 per incident, and says that mistake fares must be honored. United obviously thinks that they will not be found liable under the circumstances for these awards or else they would have honored the tickets.  And of course you can always file a complaint with your state’s attorney general, worst that can happen is that United may throw you a bone to go away.

I’m sure some folks will want to take this nuclear and file a claim in small claims court or maybe even try to create a class-action out of this.  I wish you luck and lots of time to burn as you’ll need both!

So long to my 3 free first class trips we had booked all over the world…I hardly knew ‘ye.  Now I’ll just have to go back to good ole’ reliable card churning to fly around the world in first class for free!

——————————————————

In the “darn it, I wish I was able to just jump on a plane at the drop of a hat” department, a longtime trusted DDF member, “E” (who was the 30th DDF member out of 4,500 members to signup for a free DDF account and whom I had the pleasure of having dinner with at the sadly closed Clubhouse Cafe at a DDF meetup last year) has posted multiple updates from his trip to Hong Kong to DDF.  Sensing opportunity he used an account with just 1,000 miles in it to book a first class flight that left yesterday on Lufthansa via Frankfurt that left with just 3 first class passengers on it (gotta love the First Class Terminal there and the Panamera ride to the plane!) and he is now in Hong Kong and even has his return boarding passes already in hand!

Congrats man!!!

105 Responses to “United Refuses To Honor 4 Mile (Hong Kong) Island Awards; At Least 1 DansDeals Forum Member Already Has Flown!”

  1. ND Says:
    1

    does any1 wana buy my tickets?

    ReplyReply
  2. Raj Says:
    2

    Dan, don’t you feel guilty encouraging your readers to file a DOT complaint? This was clearly a technical glitch. It just seems immoral to pursue any complaints over this.

    ReplyReply
  3. Dan Says:
    3

    @Raj:
    Where did I encourage anyone to do so?
    I said that it is within their rights if they so desire.

    Fact of the matter is that they charged people’s credit cards for taxes and sent receipts with e-ticket numbers for 4 miles and didn’t offer any clarification for well over 24 hours.

    However I’m just informing my readers of their options, not encouraging them to do so.

    ReplyReply
  4. Raj Says:
    4

    Dan,

    Your language encourages people to complain. You say ‘It’s definitely within your rights’ and ‘These complaints are big black marks for the airlines and are your way of fighting back’

    Do you think it’s moral to complain about this? Businesses make mistakes, and for you to even bring up the possibility of a DOT complaint over a legitimate mistake is disgusting.

    ReplyReply
  5. Samwise Says:
    5

    What does this guy do for a living that he could just hop on a plane in one second and fly to Hong Kong just like that?

    ReplyReply
  6. hello Says:
    6

    @Raj: You are disgusting and get of dans deals. He is allowed to tell anyone what their options are and you cant decide what is right and wrong.

    ReplyReply
  7. Will Says:
    7

    I love when people like Raj pipe up and determine something to be “disgusting” as if there were some playbook that determined that the actions presented match the adjective. Typical liberal tactic.

    ReplyReply
  8. joeb1 Says:
    8

    @Raj:

    so file a complaint ;)

    ReplyReply
  9. Marvin Says:
    9

    What the hell is wrong with you Raj? If you don’t like what Dan puts on his site then don’t come here punk! Get a life and bug off leaving stupid comments like that!

    ReplyReply
  10. bochur Says:
    10

    @Raj: why are you bashing dan?
    he has done so much good for so many people

    ReplyReply
  11. Abe Says:
    11

    Hey Dan can you get the representative from Uniteds email so I can file a complaint

    ReplyReply
  12. Joe Says:
    12

    If they can’t legally refuse to honor the tix then are they just trying to scare people into refunding the money do try wont have to honor their mistake?

    ReplyReply
  13. Dan Says:
    13

    @Abe:
    You can always use this form:
    http://www.united.com/web/en-US/content/Contact/customer/default.aspx

    ReplyReply
  14. John Says:
    14

    The DOT says that mistake fares must be honored or the airline will be penalized. Why exactly should I not complain in this case?

    ReplyReply
  15. shlomo kay Says:
    15

    Hey,

    I have not been contacted yet. Do they call you to tell you its canceled? Anyone get the call yet?

    ReplyReply
  16. Me Says:
    16

    I am with Raj on this one. I like savings on deals just as much as the next guy. I just don’t believe in benefiting on the mistakes of others.

    Also I am not sure why people are personally attacking the poster calling him ‘disgusting’ rather than his opinion.

    The only ‘justification’ is when ‘big’ airline companies make errors in their favor/reschedule flights they don’t always do the right thing?

    ReplyReply
  17. "mistake fares" Says:
    17

    Dan, I think United’s legal claim out of this, is that this is not a “mistake fare”. Actually, this wasn’t a fare at all, it was a rewards redemption, and nowhere does it mention that rewards redemptions need to be honored.

    Like you said, persuing this will require a lot of time and luck.

    ReplyReply
  18. Miler Says:
    18

    Dan,
    Any hope that we get some bonus miles or something out of this?

    ReplyReply
  19. elawyer Says:
    19

    Note the irony for the Attorneys General website “naag.org” – just saying :-)

    ReplyReply
  20. NL Says:
    20

    @Raj: Are you Kidding me????
    Raj, when you book a ticket by mistake with the wrong date, is it fair that they charge you 150 change fee??????

    We should all complain to DOT! when they make a mistake they should also be liable for a fee from us!!!

    ReplyReply
  21. Chaim Says:
    21

    Raj get a life .you are disgusting

    ReplyReply
  22. Josh Says:
    22

    @John:

    Because you are an honest and decent person.

    ReplyReply
  23. bc Says:
    23

    @bochur:

    Dan allows the public to post comments on here so Raj has every right to express his opinion, whether you disagree with it or not. Yes, Dan offers helpful advise but make no mistake, this site is a business for him and he makes money off of it (see all the adds on the right). This is not some non-profit website.

    ReplyReply
  24. bc Says:
    24

    @Dan:

    24 hrs actually seems reasonable since this happened on a Sunday. They are refunding the miles and the fees/taxes so it’s nothing out of pocket for those that signed up. I think their response is perfectly reasonable.

    ReplyReply
  25. shloime Says:
    25

    I haven’t been contacted yet either. Where did this statement come from?

    ReplyReply
  26. bc Says:
    26

    @Chaim:

    please elaborate…what makes Raj disgusting? He has an opinion and he shared it. You disagree with him, fine. What makes him disgusting?

    ReplyReply
  27. bc Says:
    27

    @NL:

    Yes because they have a stated policy that this is the change fee.

    Since they are refunding everyone the miles and the charges, no one is out of pocket anything.

    ReplyReply
  28. bc Says:
    28

    @John:

    This is not a mistake fare, that’s why. They even listed the full mileage amount initially. The mistake only showed up at the end.

    ReplyReply
  29. sam Says:
    29

    @NL: TO ALL: Forget what everyone is saying!!! NL has said it best, When i make an error the airlines dont accomidate me, so when they make an error they should not take it away from us!!!! Unacceptable!!!! and RAJ your on the wrong website!!! Dan thanks for all and i had an AWESOME Vegas trip thanks to you!!

    ReplyReply
  30. bc Says:
    30

    @Marvin:

    Raj isn’t bashing anyone. Why such venom here for anyone that has an opinion that’s different from Dan’s? These are public comment forums. I fail to understand why people take this stuff so personally. Again, Dan is no public servant passing along his ideas for our benefit. He is a businessman and this site is a profit making enterprise for him. When people come here, he makes money. Don’t forget that.

    ReplyReply
  31. Raj Says:
    31

    I want to thank @BC and others for defending me. I wasn’t attacking Dan personally. I just think sometimes people take this far. If we want our children to act with integrity, this is a case where I think people should stop before making a complaint with the DOT. It was clearly a technical glitch, as no reasonable person could expect an international mileage ticket to be four miles.

    I think Dan could have been more responsible in his posting and not mentioned the DOT complaint. He could have just made a post saying the loophole has been closed, and that fliers were being contacted by the airline that the ticket would not be honored.

    ReplyReply
  32. Nate Says:
    32

    Is it immoral to pursue complaints, probably. However, as consumers we are sick and tired of the airlines taking advantage of us. This is why there is outrage here. No one should really have expected this to go through. But just as the airline takes advantage of us when we make a mistake, for example, if you fly a lot, you have no doubt at least once made a ticket the wrong month. The airlines are constantly bullying the customers into fees when we make mistakes. If you dish it, you should be able to take it.

    I am also a little irritated at those who booked 42 tickets.. I mean seriously. Stop being so damn greedy.

    ReplyReply
  33. Andrew L Says:
    33

    Can’t log in to my United account. Anyone else have this problem?

    ReplyReply
  34. John Says:
    34

    Gotta love the airlines. When I make a mistake it’s $150 or $250 to make any change, when they make a mistake they cancel without giving me a thing.
    Bravo to all you apologists.

    ReplyReply
  35. Cathy Says:
    35

    I used to love read this site. But attacking someone who express his opinion is so low.
    I respect people who has high moral standard.

    ReplyReply
  36. duh Says:
    36

    people are calling raj disgusting because he called dan disgusting. i love how people are ok with raj calling dan disgusting but then get all up in a bunch when raj is called disgusting. quid pro quo folks!

    why would the dot have a complaint form if we shouldn’t use it for cases like these where the airline send everyone confirmed tickets and then tries to weasel out of it? at least they should have offered some miles and try to play nice. and how is it disgusting for dan to let people know their options and for people to use their own judgement? are we becoming a communist country where people shouldnt be allowed to know their rights and be heard?

    ReplyReply
  37. Me2U Says:
    37

    I dont think United owes us anything. It was a clear mistake on so many levels. Yes, it would have been a nice gesture but we are all taking it a little too extreme to assume we are deserving of anything. For every good deal, there is going to be another that goes sour. That is the nature of following all of these deal websites.

    ReplyReply
  38. Will Says:
    38

    The following website “error” when checking on my HK ticket leads me to believe that the confirmed end is all too near: “We are currently updating our website and reservations systems. This will temporarily affect our ability to serve you online and over the phone.”

    ReplyReply
  39. Ray Says:
    39

    To all who are feeling sorry for RAJ, DONT he’s just being kind to the airline because A. He works there. B. He didnt Get a ticket cancelled on him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyReply
  40. bc Says:
    40

    @sam:

    There is a cost involved to the airline if you make a mistake and want to make a change. There needs to be a penalty otherwise everyone would be constantly changing dates, times, flights etc. They made a mistake (not really as it was a technical glitch and not a strategic error) and gave everyone there miles and money back. Why should they owe you anything beyond that? What cost was there to you? People always feel like they are owed something in this country.

    ReplyReply
  41. bc Says:
    41

    @duh:

    For the record…Raj said what Dan was doing was disgusting. Others called Raj himself disgusting. I’ll leave it to others to determine if there’s a difference.

    ReplyReply
  42. Raj Says:
    42

    @duh – i did not call Dan disgusting. I was describing the act of complaining to the DOT disgusting
    @Ray – Trust me I don’t work for United or anyone else in the travel industry. I visit this site like you for info on great deals. But I have morals, and know that complaining about a mistake is not the right thing to do.

    The entitlement some people feel here is scary.

    ReplyReply
  43. duh Says:
    43

    you are twisting your words. you told dan “for you to even bring up the possibility of a DOT complaint over a legitimate mistake is disgusting” and now you claim to have said “complaining about a mistake is not the right thing to do.”

    so which is it, was it disgusting for dan to give his readers the info needed should they wish to file a claim for something the dot says that they enforce (airlines not honoring a pricing error) or is disgusting for someone to actually file the claim?

    ReplyReply
  44. Moish Says:
    44

    Will everyone just chill, there are valid points being made here just leave the personal attacks and passion out it makes life more fun

    ReplyReply
  45. hello Says:
    45

    @Raj: Ok so your upset you didn’t get in on the price mistake fare;)

    ReplyReply
  46. bc Says:
    46

    @hello: No one “got in on it”. They corrected the error and credited people back their miles. Case closed. Why does anyone feel they are entitled to something here? What was anyone’s damages related to this?

    ReplyReply
  47. josh Says:
    47

    @John:

    bc it was clearly a mistake and you dont have to be a pig about it!

    ReplyReply
  48. bc Says:
    48

    @josh: Why does these comments have to get so peronal? How am I being a pig? Honestly, explain that? I’m just questioning why people think they are entitled to anything beyond an apology and a full refund. How is that being a pig?

    ReplyReply
  49. TtcommentT Says:
    49

    What about the Fairmont platinum for life with living social. They honored it. And was a huge mistake

    ReplyReply
  50. mendel Says:
    50

    @Raj:

    how is that immoral??? airlines can and do hit you up with technicalities all the time, in order to have things go in their favor. if there is a DOT law that says airlines must honor misprint ad’s, then that’s just a technicality i the consumers favor.

    ReplyReply
  51. MoishRegardless Says:
    51

    @bc
    As far as I know no1 had their tickets cancelled, but mine are definitely still active, just yet don’t spew junk

    ReplyReply
  52. TT Says:
    52

    Every flight you go on has atleast one empty seat do if they lets on for free they’re actually no loosing anything.
    And as someone said. We as the customer loose if we make a mistake. We have to pay an extra $75 to change the date of wease it wrong. Think of all the $$ united made on these mistakes. To let a few guys fly wouldnt be such a loss for them.

    ReplyReply
  53. bc Says:
    53

    @TtcommentT: That seems very different to me. First, that was not a technical glitch but a wrongly worded advertisement handled by a third party (who likely had to pay up considerably to the client). Fairmont also had no obligation to honor the advertisement but did so anyway. United could have honored this agreement but obviously didn’t. That people feel entitled to some kind of “freebie” is what I take issue with. Seems like you have to prove some kind of damages to be entitled to a reward from them. Their clearly were no damages here.

    ReplyReply
  54. Dan Says:
    54

    I’m not going to drag myself into this, but for the record,

    “Some argue that United is running afoul of a new Transportation Department regulation that bans post-purchase price increases of airline tickets unless it is a result of an increase in government-imposed taxes.

    The law also states that passengers have to be provided with full disclosure of the potential price increase.

    The department says that if a consumer buys a ticket and receives confirmation of the purchase either though an e-mail or on a credit card statement, “then the seller of air transportation cannot increase the price of that air transportation to that consumer, even when the fare is a ‘mistake.’ ”

    Bill Mosley, a spokesman for the Transportation Department, says that the department is looking into several complaints it received about the frequent-flier tickets. He says the new rule would apply to frequent-flier tickets, “particularly when they also entail cash payments.”"

    Via, http://travel.usatoday.com/flights/story/2012-07-17/United-Forget-the-cheap-ticket-to-Hong-Kong-we-goofed/56273516/1

    ReplyReply
  55. bc Says:
    55

    @Dan: Dan – that rule does not pertain here. The opinion of the TSA spokesman is irrelevant here. What’s relevant is what the rule itself states and frequent-flier tickets are not referenced in the language.

    ReplyReply
  56. Dan Says:
    56

    @bc:
    TSA spokesman, huh??
    He is a DoT spokesman! I sure hope he knows their own rules that they enforce before making a statement to a national newspaper and from that article it seems they are already investigating people’s complaints in this case.
    Personally I’ve done nothing as of yet, but that doesn’t mean I won’t be following the case closely.

    ReplyReply
  57. bc Says:
    57

    @Dan:

    Unless he knows more than what’s written, he’s expressing an opinion. Here’s the exact language:
    Therefore, if a consumer purchases a fare and that consumer receives confirmation (such as a confirmation email and/or the purchase appears on their credit card statement or online account summary) of their purchase, then the seller of air transportation cannot increase the price of that air transportation to that consumer, even when the fare is a “mistake.”

    There is no language pertaining to frequent flier mileage. Sure someone can argue that raising the miles required is the same as raising the price but just one individual’s interpretation.

    ReplyReply
  58. Yehuda S Says:
    58

    Ok everyone here is the 600,000 mile Question:

    If this fare is upheld as valid by the DoT, can people (following UA rules) cancel their tickets for $150 and have them reimburse the miles??

    ReplyReply
  59. Yehuda S Says:
    59

    @Yehuda S: Wait, you wouldnt want that. What i meant was can changes be made, open jaws and stopovers added etc?

    ReplyReply
  60. myairplane Says:
    60

    This is becoming slightly interesting. Im confirmed for a trip that I need to take and was surprised to even get ticketed. Now that its been more than 48 hours, I get the feeling we may be in for a nice surprise.

    ReplyReply
  61. TT Says:
    61

    @bc

    I’m not saying they have to honor it. I just think iit will be very nice if they do. As Fairmont did. Staying in a hotel room every year for life costs more than a person sitting in a seat on a plane. Think of it. The empty seat that ur filling doesn’t cost them that much, what ? Some food? Luggage ? All in all very little.

    ReplyReply
  62. kreisberg Says:
    62

    @dan
    I have a ticket. If I called United to change it to a ticket to Israel, what would happen?

    ReplyReply
  63. senioreditor Says:
    63

    well said………………

    ReplyReply
  64. senioreditor Says:
    64

    Raj is 100% right! You who call yourself religious are not truly religious.

    ReplyReply
  65. Matza Says:
    65

    @TT: Much bigger variable cost in the airplane seat than the hotel. The real issue though is opportunity cost. The hotel room sells for maybe 500 a night versus 10,000 for a first class seat to Hong Kong.

    ReplyReply
  66. Nate Says:
    66

    @senioreditor y@senioreditor: you must be drunk buddy… What does religion have anything to do with this? Why are you mixing business and pleasure.. Once again, while this may not be grounds for a lawsuit, the airlines are not the innocent victims here. Why are people defending the airline anyway? The only thing i can think of is that there are many people here that missed the deal and can’t really cope with this fact so they are lashing out.. Let the airline fend for themselves and “let he without sin cast the first stone.”

    On a side note my iPad really pisses me off… Why is it so hard to sync pictures? Why couldn’t they include normal keyboard arrows for left/right cursor movement? Why is there service so terrible?

    ReplyReply
  67. nat Says:
    67

    @Yehuda S:

    you will have your 4 miles returned

    ReplyReply
  68. HKFlyer Says:
    68

    @Dan: Dan, you have missed a very important point. There is an award ticket redemption chart published in united.com, and the correct amount is shown when the award tickets are quoted. Since there is a fixed price structure, United has a much stronger case to defend it and not honoring that. However, I think United should honor the ones that have already started flying to avoid any travel disruption on them.

    ReplyReply
  69. Nate Says:
    69

    *Their service.. And the auto-populate as you can see is not always so helpful… Thank you Steve Jobs..

    ReplyReply
  70. Me, Of-Course! Says:
    70

    This whole American Rights thing is inevitably going to swallow up everyone, think about it, we all have ‘rights’ against each other… rights to take advantage of a mistake, whats the next ‘right’ going to be? A right to steal? G-d help us

    ReplyReply
  71. hello Says:
    71

    @bc: I have no clue what your talking about, United never cancelled anyones tickets and as of now they are honoring all tickets booked. Will that change? maybe. Till then keep your mouth closed because you have no clue whats going on at united. Next time follow DansDeals and you could have also booked one of these tickets.

    ReplyReply
  72. its them Says:
    72

    Why hasn’t UA provided a more official response?
    I think its being honored. Lucky for who got ticketed.

    ReplyReply
  73. Eli Says:
    73

    I’m very disappointed. I love churning, US mint (RIP), etc. as much as the next guy, but taking advantage (as this clearly is) of an honest mistake that no one thought for a second was a legitimately published price is stretching it. Letting people know how they can give the airline a “big black mark” via the DOT for refunding the miles and canceling is immature and immoral. Period. There are more honest ways of making money, like measuring restaurant bathrooms and then suing them and settling for huge sums under the Americans With Disabilities Act, like one really low attorney I know used to do. Hey, it’s in the statute, so it must be OK to do it!

    ReplyReply
  74. Steve Says:
    74

    Clubhouse Cafe is closed? In NY?

    ReplyReply
  75. Jason Says:
    75

    http://travel.usatoday.com/flights/story/2012-07-17/United-Forget-the-cheap-ticket-to-Hong-Kong-we-goofed/56273516/1

    ReplyReply
  76. pilotb757 Says:
    76

    @John:
    not on reward tickets only on purchased airfare, especially showing the correct miles but showing 4 miles total,

    ReplyReply
  77. Moshe K Says:
    77

    @kreisberg: They will say go take a hike and jump in the lake at the end of the trail……

    ReplyReply
  78. tt Says:
    78

    @Matza there’s always empty seats on the plane so the actual cost for me on the plane is not much, and remember $500 x 120 years is $60,000. Fairmont gave a free room for life.

    ReplyReply
  79. duh Says:
    79

    blah blah blah, america this america that. even in communist china they honor these things should have bought from them instead of united

    http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2012-07/13/content_15577414.htm

    ReplyReply
  80. bc Says:
    80

    @hello: I don’t want to go to Hong Kong so I’m good. Thanks for the helpful advice about what to do with my mouth but I think I’ll make that decision on my own. Again, why the personal attacks dude?

    ReplyReply
  81. bc Says:
    81

    Love the enthusiasm here for people taking advantage of a company’s technical error and then feeling so wronged by them when they decide not too. Assume you would take candy from a vending machine too if if suddenly started dispensing it. Morals people.

    ReplyReply
  82. Dan Says:
    82

    Business Insider gives the link for folks to complain about the tickets not be honored to the DoT.
    Guess they’re disgusting as well :D
    http://www.businessinsider.com/united-screw-up-lets-customers-nab-40-tickets-to-china-and-now-it-wants-them-back-2012-7

    ReplyReply
  83. bc Says:
    83

    Honest question….if you tried to withdraw $100 from an ATM and it ended up giving you $1000, would you keep the money? What’s the difference here?

    ReplyReply
  84. Yehuda Says:
    84

    Hey, when people saw this deal they just bought it quickly for a variety of reasons. They weren’t “looting”.

    For most people the reasons were:

    Just buy it and see how it plays out. 97% of people won’t fight United decision to not honor but if they decide to honor then United will essentially be handing a free ticket out of their own independent free will. Why not take it then?

    Additionally when the news broke no one sat around to ponder the correct ethical high road because there is always a remote possibility that there was some kind of deal going on. No one really knows the airlines reason for offering a cheap fare. It is totally possible that United wanted to sprinkle a few amazing fares and by accident more then they intended got sold. Also possible that there was a sale but only for 40,000 miles instead of 140,000 and an error turned it into a 4.

    Lastly, 99.9 of this ‘candy’ wasn’t ‘eaten’ yet i.e. no services have been rendered so most people have not taken a thing.

    Of course an important thing to remember is the United mistake fare policy as delineated in the WSJ article. I didn’t see until now but someone who had, would look at the 4 mile fare and say “hey, wow! United said they would honor these so I guess it’s ok to grab it”.

    Just my $.02 AKA One way first class ticket to Hong Kong ;-)

    ReplyReply
  85. Yehuda Says:
    85

    @Yehuda: Oh and one more thing: Even if I don’t get my $70 tax fee back I’d say it was worth it for the most entertaining week in a looong time!

    ReplyReply
  86. hello Says:
    86

    @bc: That’s against the law, this isn’t

    ReplyReply
  87. bc Says:
    87

    @Yehuda: I don’t disagree with you. What I have a problem with is people somehow thinking they are “owed” something by United. United recognized the mistake, refunded everyone’s miles and apologized. Why should they do anything beyond that? How is anyone put out by the airline?

    ReplyReply
  88. bc Says:
    88

    @hello: I don’t know if it is or isn’t? I’m asking you and others if you’d keep the money.

    ReplyReply
  89. Noam Says:
    89

    http://t.co/e7OcIj6B

    Seems the wall street journal is all over it too…

    ReplyReply
  90. Joe Shmo Says:
    90

    @bc: Hell yeah I Would!! gay kak in yam!!

    ReplyReply
  91. duh Says:
    91

    hello there raj

    https://twitter.com/rajunarisetti

    http://folks.co.in/business/2012/01/22/raju-narisetti-is-wsjs-digital-network/

    does the wsj always employ managing editors who call bloggers disgusting for telling readers their rights?

    perhaps gather the nerve to call wsj’s Scott McCartney disgusting while you are at it: http://blogs.wsj.com/middleseat/2012/07/18/dot-investigates-after-united-says-it-will-kill-award-tickets-it-sold-for-4-miles/

    ReplyReply
  92. Hudi Says:
    92

    @bc: No because you could get arrested

    ReplyReply
  93. Eli Says:
    93

    No, I wouldn’t call Business Insider “disgusting”. Unethical? Yeah, I think so. Some people don’t think ethics ever plays a role- the limit is simply what one can legitimately get away with no matter how low you go. I’ll pass, thanks.

    ReplyReply
  94. jj1000 Says:
    94

    @duh: That’s epic! (If true) How did you put that all together?

    ReplyReply
  95. Joe Shmo Says:
    95

    @Raj: HAHA RAJu exposed!!!!

    ReplyReply
  96. Freddie Says:
    96

    What do you mean by “island” awards?

    ReplyReply
  97. Dan Says:
    97

    @Freddie:
    Just a poor attempt at 3 mile island humor with the nucleur reference in the post…
    The main tourist sections of Hong Kong are split up between Kowloon and Hong Kong Island.

    ReplyReply
  98. ely Says:
    98

    Hey Dan,
    United never contacted us and my tickets are still active online… what are your thoughts?! My ticket is for 2 weeks from now… You think I’m gonna go?.. I’m not sure who to believe anymore, since I dont see any real action from United. I’m still hoping that they will honor it. what do you say?

    ReplyReply
  99. Hello!!!! Says:
    99

    Am I the only one who’s sick of this “moral debate”? I want to see trip notes fromt the dude who actually made it!

    ReplyReply
  100. Sunny Says:
    100

    one guy on the forums just got his ticket cancelled and he was suppose to leave tommorow :(

    ReplyReply
  101. To Dan Says:
    101

    Dan,

    If you read this comment, can you please explain why the united glitch is any different than this story here?:

    http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/local/courier_times_news/cops-man-spent-nearly-mistakenly-deposited-in-his-bank-account/article_67fd1ff3-1d5c-59b7-a1cb-33bfcb720acb.html

    If the man in the above story can be prosecuted, why can’t those who took the flights to Hong Kong be prosecuted?

    ReplyReply
  102. Sunny Says:
    102

    @To Dan: You’re obviously not such a bright guy and you don’t deserve an answer.

    ReplyReply
  103. jj1000 Says:
    103

    I sure hope all the moralists here have stock in United, because I don’t see any other logical parallel between doing something illegal and taking advantage of a price mistake with a precedent and rules that it must be honored.
    #MoralIdeas=/=Objective
    #Moralist=/=Right

    ReplyReply
  104. shlomo kay Says:
    104

    @ely:

    I have the same issue

    ReplyReply
  105. daniel Says:
    105

    You know this stor has gone global when it gets to yahoo.com’s feed :)

    http://news.yahoo.com/battle-over-33-flights-hong-kong-200052930–finance.html

    ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Switch to our mobile site